One time transfer rule approved
- noladave
- Regent's Circle
- Posts: 8444
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 7:50 am
- Location: new orleans, la
- Contact:
One time transfer rule approved
buckle up. Kendall Rogers predicts a fairly significant impact in baseball, after approval of one time transfer rule
- PeteRasche
- Cornerstone
- Posts: 30922
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:52 am
- Location: Cincinnati, OH
Re: One time transfer rule approved
Weren't baseball players allowed to transfer without sitting out 15 years ago? If so, what's different now other than players being more willing to move?
Re: One time transfer rule approved
College baseball is different now. “Power” conferences now care more and if it affects them, it’s a bigger deal.
Tulane Greenbackers
"If you want to win you have to have good players." Vince Gibson
"If you want to win you have to have good players." Vince Gibson
-
- Navigator Level
- Posts: 1292
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 6:09 pm
Re: One time transfer rule approved
The new transfer rule should help TU.
Years ago when Jones was around, that's was one way he was able to get some very good impact players to transfer. That's is what TU needs, impact players.
Years ago when Jones was around, that's was one way he was able to get some very good impact players to transfer. That's is what TU needs, impact players.
- gerryb323
- Regent's Circle
- Posts: 9660
- Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:18 am
- Location: There's no place like home
Re: One time transfer rule approved
Look at all these Micah Owings references today!
Wandering around somewhere in a matchup zone
Re: One time transfer rule approved
I fear power 5 will poach other conferences turning them into a farm system. Football is a real concern.
- long green
- Cornerstone
- Posts: 29126
- Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 10:34 am
- Location: New Orleans
Re: One time transfer rule approved
They'll also lose players every year.
And may our enemies, if they exist, be unconscious of our purpose. - From The Lady Vanishes
Re: One time transfer rule approved
The players they lose for the most part will be because they couldn't cut it as they were overrated. The players they pick up will be players who were underrated and have proven they can play at the P5 level.
We deserve so much better
- gerryb323
- Regent's Circle
- Posts: 9660
- Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:18 am
- Location: There's no place like home
Re: One time transfer rule approved
Like Joe Burrow and Justin McMillan.
Quote:The Good - TULANE
The Bad - LSU
THe Ugly - USM
Honorable mention - Navy
The Bad - LSU
THe Ugly - USM
Honorable mention - Navy
Re: One time transfer rule approved
Seriously though. I lot of very good players are not given chances at big schools because they are only a 4 star when the team just signed a shiny new 5 star or they are a good 3 start who was never given a real shot. Coaches and position coaches have favorites and play people they subjectively like over players who may be better.
Quote:The Good - TULANE
The Bad - LSU
THe Ugly - USM
Honorable mention - Navy
The Bad - LSU
THe Ugly - USM
Honorable mention - Navy
- gerryb323
- Regent's Circle
- Posts: 9660
- Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:18 am
- Location: There's no place like home
Re: One time transfer rule approved
Wandering around somewhere in a matchup zone
Re: One time transfer rule approved
- gerryb323
- Regent's Circle
- Posts: 9660
- Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:18 am
- Location: There's no place like home
Re: One time transfer rule approved
Yes
Wandering around somewhere in a matchup zone
Re: One time transfer rule approved
There's always exception to the rule but this won't be good overall for Tulane and other G5's. As to McMillan he doesn't belong in that category with Burrow. Not even close.
We deserve so much better
- Sophandros
- Regent's Circle
- Posts: 7742
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 2:33 pm
- Location: The Nerdy Dirty South
- Contact:
Re: One time transfer rule approved
What wavedom described just happened to us in women's basketball.
Sports Talk radio and most sports message boards are the killing fields of intellectual discourse.
Re: One time transfer rule approved
Hey were bith transfers that "couldnt cut it" and the schools they went to had to deal with getting a player who couldnt cut it. Were tthey not both good for the schools that took them,? They are in the same category if not the caliber player.
You have to prove the rule before its a rule.
Quote:The Good - TULANE
The Bad - LSU
THe Ugly - USM
Honorable mention - Navy
The Bad - LSU
THe Ugly - USM
Honorable mention - Navy
Re: One time transfer rule approved
How much do you attribute that to LS? Pratt didnt transfer and hew as acclaimed by many sites as a top freshman as well. Do we give CWF enough credit for that.Sophandros wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 3:59 pmWhat wavedom described just happened to us in women's basketball.
Who your coach is and their ability has a lot to do with it.
Quote:The Good - TULANE
The Bad - LSU
THe Ugly - USM
Honorable mention - Navy
The Bad - LSU
THe Ugly - USM
Honorable mention - Navy
- tulaneoutlaw
- Regent's Circle
- Posts: 8867
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:49 pm
- Location: Greeneville, TN
Re: One time transfer rule approved
This rule is really good for players and that's why I am for it. If coaches can leave willy nilly, 18 yos deserve a chance to make a mistake and then rectify it.
It does complicate Tulane's position, but we are already lower in the pecking order than a bunch of schools. This really doesn't change that. We still have to do a great job recruiting, developing, and retaining talent, same as before.
It does complicate Tulane's position, but we are already lower in the pecking order than a bunch of schools. This really doesn't change that. We still have to do a great job recruiting, developing, and retaining talent, same as before.
Re: One time transfer rule approved
Burrow is not a valid example, he went from one P5 national title contender to another. My concern is p5 teams cherry picking non p5 players to fill areas of need. Will schools have the ability to offer players on other teams? If not it will be done via back channels, but done none the less. Upward mobility for non p5 teams to ascend to p5 type of talent level just got more difficult.
Last edited by zmanno on Thu Apr 15, 2021 5:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: One time transfer rule approved
The portal goes in both directions. Sharper coaches and programs will benefit. Duller coaches and programs won't. Same as regular recruiting.
Re: One time transfer rule approved
McMillan was not a good D-1n QB. He could perform ok when playing a team with a bad D. When facing a defense with a pulse he wasn't up to it. Low bar syndrome there. The rule is there for all to see. How many times have we had people posting with an excitement when we get a someone from FSU, Oklahoma and the such and then nothing. As time goes on this will prove detrimental to our program.Poseidon wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 4:03 pmHey were bith transfers that "couldnt cut it" and the schools they went to had to deal with getting a player who couldnt cut it. Were tthey not both good for the schools that took them,? They are in the same category if not the caliber player.
You have to prove the rule before its a rule.
We deserve so much better
-
- President's Circle
- Posts: 4382
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 4:26 pm
Re: One time transfer rule approved
Still digging deeper on your take that Banks was better than McMillan ?wavedom wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 5:36 pmMcMillan was not a good D-1n QB. He could perform ok when playing a team with a bad D. When facing a defense with a pulse he wasn't up to it. Low bar syndrome there. The rule is there for all to see. How many times have we had people posting with an excitement when we get a someone from FSU, Oklahoma and the such and then nothing. As time goes on this will prove detrimental to our program.Poseidon wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 4:03 pmHey were bith transfers that "couldnt cut it" and the schools they went to had to deal with getting a player who couldnt cut it. Were tthey not both good for the schools that took them,? They are in the same category if not the caliber player.
You have to prove the rule before its a rule.