TUPF wrote:Roller wrote:I only hope that they don't go overboard with environmental zeal and fall into the trap of using pseudo-science to justify impractical approaches at the expense of reasonable solutions that implement intelligent choices.
If this translates into: stop erosion...I'm in.
It should be MUCH more than stopping erosion. They need to recognize the complex nature of the system with which they are dealing. There are ways to stop erosion,but if you eliminate the fractal nature of the erosion/accretion processes, breeding habitat for shrimp and fish will be sacrificed. You have to also take into account the needs for flood control, navigation, fisheries, water quality, marsh health, and many other, sometimes competing, considerations. Failure to pay enough attention to any one element of the problem merely exacerbates it.
A good book on the subject was written (about 20 years ago) by a friend of mine, Bill Streever:
"Saving Louisiana? The Battle for Coastal Wetlands"
. It's fairly short (only about 200 pages), but he discusses many of the causes, effects, and potential remedies. He's also quite zealous about pursuing reasonable solutions.